Chris you are NOT crazy, this is why...

[lara4228]

Hello,

I have 't been on LCR all weekend. This is Monday January 23rd 2011. I logged briefly yesterday only to grab an email from a thread created awhile ago. My log on was probably less than 1 minute.

I click on my User CP to check through posts that I have already replied to, just to keep myself updated and I notice that the posts were started "3 Days ago" This is false. BJ's post about the FUN show was started over a week ago, not 3 days ago.

Here is another thread that was created about a week ago. But it shows on the OP "3 Days ago"
http://www.lincolncentresource.net/forums/showthread.php?t=18686

So this in tune with Chris's craziness does prove that there IS a glitch somewhere in the system.

I'm not trying to trouble shoot, I will that for the professionals, I only want to see if others too are experiencing the timeline glitch.

Thanks,

Lara

[cimperialis]

AHA! I'm not crazy either! I've always thought those dates seemed a little off. Good work, Ms. Lara, PI.

However, I will say this. If you want the exact time and date, click on "Thread Tools" (at the top of the first post in a thread). Then click "Show Printable Version." It will open a new page with the dates/times on the far right side of the page. In the thread on camera setup you provided, the it says it was posted at 1-19-12 at 7:39PM. The FUN thread from BJ says he first posted at 10:26AM on 1-19-12. This was over three days ago but not quite four days, so it's rounding down to three days. I can't remember as well as you on this one, but if you say you're sure is was longer, then OK.

[lara4228]

Sean, here is link to my all my posts I've made. It shows that I made a post 2 days ago, which would have made that Saturday January 21st 2011. This weekend I tried to make it a goal NOT to turn my internet on. I wanted a weekend for Barclay and I. And I succeeded until late yesterday evening.

So I KNOW that this timeline is incorrect. When I quickly logged on yesterday, it showed me a total of 609 posts. This forum does not do 609 in 2 days, generally speaking. The 609 does sound like a more accurate number of posts missed for a 3-4 day period.

http://www.lincolncentresource.net/forums/search.php?searchid=589267

[Maineman750]

lara, it says BJ's post about the fun show was started 3 weeks ago, not 3 days:tinysmile_hmm_t:

[lara4228]

lara, it says BJ's post about the fun show was started 3 weeks ago, not 3 days:tinysmile_hmm_t:

Dang it! I am going to take a picture of my screen and upload it to here. I know my screen shows 3 days. I may be a little on the nutsy side sometimes, but I know I took my meds and I'm thinking clearly here!:LOL_Hair:

[cimperialis]

Roger, she means the FUN show post he made describing how the show went. He also posted another thread 3 weeks ago advertising for the show.

Post about the show, showing "3 days ago"
http://www.lincolncentresource.net/forums/showthread.php?t=18670

Post advertising the show, made "3 weeks ago"
http://www.lincolncentresource.net/forums/showthread.php?t=18104

[Maineman750]

but I know I took my meds

How many times did you take them this morning ?:LOL_Hair:

[lara4228]

:sign10: Hardy Har Har Roger ;) Tres comical! I took them twice because I because I couldn't remember if I took them the first time. lol

Ok so here is my picture to show you what I'm seeing.

[Maineman750]

Sean got me straight lara. I did the thread tools trick he mentioned and it says it was started 1-19-2012 at 10:47 am..but I guess the bigger question is how do you know it was started earlier than that ?

[lara4228]

My elephant memory ~ please God don't let me make myself look like a fool right now, please? ~ :LOL_Hair:

[Maineman750]

Well, I'm not sure that would be proof enough for somebody to investigate. I know what Sean said abouit rounding is true because of the discussion Chris and I had about his post. Why don't you take a snapshot of this thread and check back a week later to see if it is off more than a day ? Or ask BJ if he remembers what day he started that thread..but if he is like me,I don't keep track or even have a need to remember.

[liveandievarieties]

There is no question as to whetherr something is amiss. I hit my 1500th post Tuesday night, 1/17, now my post count is 1475. It's been an entire week and I'm below where I was in posts last Tuesday. To be honest, it's a little demoralizing, but I've got a lot of sorting and packaging to do, so there's no shortage of where my time is needed to be utilized.

[DoubleYou]

Hm. My computer says 4 days instead of 3 days. LOL. I don't really care. If I "lose" some posts, that'll make me look better, since right now I look like SUCH a BLABBERMOUTH. As to so many days ago, I'm glad, as it's demoralizing to see I have unread posts from 3 weeks ago!

[jfines69]

Time zone differences... Sounds like the web site is improperly adjusting for the time zones... Or it could be the time warp signature... Where did I put my meds... They were here last week now they're gone... Darn time warp signatures... LOL!!!

[jcuve]

This makes no sense. Hopefully Brad or Pat have an answer...

[Maineman750]

I figured out part of it. It does not count a full day until it reaches the exact time of the post. The post we were looking at showed 3 days until 10:26 am today, then it showed 4 days.

[mustbebob]

I received a reply from Brad, and he will take the issue up with Pat. Their priority right now is the coppercoins forum stuff, but it will get worked soon.