PDA

View Full Version : 1983 D definite rpm not on CC ATTN:BOB


wheatcents
04-27-2009, 05:02 PM
i have to say that there is no doubt that this is an rpm what do you guys think

Wheat Cents
04-27-2009, 05:14 PM
At first look I'd say yes. An RPM and a strong one. You should send that in.

Its stronger than 1983-D WRPM-015 in D/D West pictured in Volume Seven Number 1 ( March / April 2005 ) of "The HUB."

wheatcents
04-27-2009, 05:16 PM
is this variety lested anywhere in your references?

Wheat Cents
04-27-2009, 05:23 PM
There are at least 15 in the Wexler files . That WRPM-015 D/D west was the last one I have record of. The others I know of are either tilted or CCW RPMs. Not the case on yours.

Again I would send it in.. ( in alphabetical order) Bordner, Crawford, Piazza or Wiles

mustbebob
04-27-2009, 05:30 PM
Looks like an RPM to me also. I know for sure it is not on coppercoins, but do not know if it is listed anywhere else.

Wheat Cents
04-27-2009, 05:32 PM
Here is a good guy to send it in to. ( mustbebob )

Maybe you'll credit on CC for the coin.

wheatcents
04-27-2009, 05:35 PM
and i just sent that other coin today D**nit ha ha ha

mustbebob
04-27-2009, 05:37 PM
If you want, you can send this one now, and I will return both of them together after the attribution.

wheatcents
04-27-2009, 05:38 PM
yeah ill so that its too late to send it out today ill have to get it out tomorrow

mustbebob
04-27-2009, 05:45 PM
Knowing the post office, they will both get here at the same time.

wheatcents
04-27-2009, 05:52 PM
thank you much bob

dvn
04-28-2009, 05:06 AM
From the image looks to be MDD.

Billy

trails
04-28-2009, 05:07 AM
A couple of things bother me. First, the flow lines are continued from the field into the secondary image. Also the the secondary image appears flat and incomplete. While some repunched mint marks are not complete, one this strong should be complete unless the punch was at a tilt. And lastly, there is no notching to be seen on the mint mark. Once again, with one so strong, this should be a feature easily seen.

I believe it to be tilted machine doubling, which is commonly seen.

However, this conclusion is based on the pictures alone and as we all know, a coin in hand may tell a different story.

BJ Neff

mustbebob
04-28-2009, 09:58 AM
When I get the coin in hand, I will be able to tell what it is as well. We will let you know what it turns out to be.

enamel7
04-28-2009, 09:38 PM
Looks like the real thing to me.

eaxtellcoin
05-01-2009, 08:14 PM
I hate to be the skeptic here but that looks alot like machine shift. The serifs are un defined and the pull is correct. I will agree it doesn't show up real good in his full date pic though. Interesting!!! Do you see the same shift on any other points on the OBV?