1956 d/s (fs-1956d-511)

[1sgret]

This one has come up in the variety arena again and I don't think there is any disputing that there is a "S" mintmark between the "1" and "9" of the date.

There is an excellent article in Coin World Magazine, Pg. 60, dtd; May 18, 2009 by John Wexler and this is listed in the Crawford Files as CDMM-001.

[jcuve]

NICE! MS66 too...wow!

[RWBILLER]

Hi:
Beautifullllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll!
roger

[celartu]

I have several years of collecting coin, but that of varierites and errors of the Lincoln Cent is new for me, slowly I´m learnin, gracias

[lineop3]

Dat's purrdy n shy-knee!!!

[Wheat Cents]

I beleive it is a Dual MM

[hasfam]

Beautiful. Absolutley gorgeous.
Rock

[mikediamond]

James Wiles (and therefore CONECA) have delisted this purported dual mintmark. I'm agnostic on the issue. There will always be doubt when dealing with a trace this faint and incomplete. A simulacrum is always a possibility. After all, among US coins there are undoubtedly tens of thousands of tiny die dents. Chances are one will eventually resemble a mintmark in size and shape.

[jpl6332]

Well well....after having read that I still say this is a nice coin.

[MintyFresh]

Beautiful coin...